|
myOtaku.com
• Join Today!
My Pages
• Home
• Portfolio
• Guestbook
Contact Me
Website
• Click Here
Vitals
Birthday
• 1993-03-30
Gender
•
Female
Location
• Ekaterinburg; Russia
Member Since
• 2006-06-05
Occupation
• designer of many things...
Real Name
• if i told you i would have to kill you
Personal
Anime Fan Since
• for about 7 or 8 years
Favorite Anime
• Le Chevalier D'Eon
Goals
• none
Hobbies
• sewing, drawing and sleeping
Talents
• drawing
|
|
|
|
myOtaku.com: Alchemic Mushroom
|
I'm a Gothic Otaku, christian and proud! This one designs clothes, wishes to create lolita dresses. Am shy and somber, petite and pretty. Not a big fan of FullMetal Alchemist at this point of time.
One is of few words, like to keep it short yet descriptive (eccept when this one rants), likes myotaku better than theotaku WORLDS. The Mushroom of Alchemy has nothing further to say..
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Little Women
So anywho, I just got done watching the movie Little Women (It was the remade version) and me, a big fan of the Victorian era, couldn't help but dwell on the thoughts of how historicaly incorrect the dresses were! The story was in the 1860's, I know this because of the father who was a soldier in the Civil War, a war in the 60's! Now, during this time, the dresses would have been at their biggest! And yet, it shows the skirts as those of the Turn of the Century, which was after the era with the bustel dresses. Later in the story it showed Amy March in a Bustle gown; in the fashion of a bustle gown from the 70's! The only thing I saw that was historicaly correct were the blouses, and the sleeves (lower half) were a bit off as well. And, of course, the movie wasn't as good as the book. The movie wasn't even as good as the original film!
Comments
(0) |
Permalink
|
|
